Steel HF2006.17 Laparoscopy Medical Equipment Reusable Magnetic Trocar Safety Trocar

FAQ

What are the advantages of single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments over reusable ones?

The advantages of disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments over reuse are mainly reflected in the following aspects:

High safety: Disposable instruments can avoid the risk of cross-infection, reduce the risk of infection during surgery, and ensure patient safety.

Reduce postoperative recovery time: Minimally invasive surgery itself has the advantages of small incisions, low pain, and low risk of infection, and disposable instruments further reduce the risk of infection, thus helping to shorten hospitalization and recovery time.

Economical: In some cases, single-use devices are more economical than reusable devices. For example, in traditional flexible ureteroscopy surgery, the cost of a single surgery may be higher given the longevity of the flexible lens and frequency of repairs.

Simple approval process: Compared with reusable medical consumables, disposable medical devices have a simpler approval process, are faster on the market, and recover costs faster.

Disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments have significant advantages in terms of safety, postoperative recovery time, surgical efficiency and economy.

What is the specific mechanism by which single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments reduce cross-infection?

The specific mechanisms of disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments in reducing cross-infection mainly include the following aspects:

Reduce the risk of reuse: The one-time use method reduces the risk of cross-infection caused by reuse. Traditional surgical instruments require cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization during reuse. These processes may increase the risk of cross-infection due to improper operation or aging of the instruments.

Avoid personnel contact during logistics and distribution: Disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments are usually packaged in sterile packaging, which reduces personnel contact and processes during logistics and distribution, thereby effectively avoiding nosocomial cross-infection.

Improving the safety of the surgical environment: Disposable and customized surgical bags have become a key direction to reduce cross-infection. As the penetration rate of minimally invasive surgery increases, the demand for disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments and accessories is also increasing, which helps Improve the safety of the overall surgical environment.

What scientific research or data supports the difference in postoperative recovery time between single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments and reusable instruments?

There is no clear scientific study or data to support the difference in post-operative recovery time between single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments and reusable instruments. However, available evidence suggests that minimally invasive surgery often offers the advantages of shorter postoperative recovery times, reduced pain, and shorter hospital stays.

For example, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed through three small holes of a few millimeters in the abdomen. You can be discharged from the hospital 2 to 3 days after the operation and return to work within a week. For minimally invasive lung surgery, you can usually go about your business on the 2nd to 3rd day after surgery. If you perform rapid recovery surgery, you will be hospitalized on the same day, operated on the same day, and discharged on the same day. You can usually return to normal work in about 2 weeks. In addition, the minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment technology of cardiovascular surgery has also significantly shortened the postoperative hospitalization and recovery time.

Although the information I searched mainly focuses on traditional minimally invasive surgery, it can be speculated that single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments may further shorten the postoperative recovery time by reducing the risk of infection during instrument replacement and sterilization.

In what specific circumstances are single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments more economical than reusable instruments?

In certain circumstances, single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments can be more economical than reusable instruments. The following is a detailed analysis:

Reduce human interference during surgery: Disposable minimally invasive endoscopic cutting staplers and their components can achieve passive operation, reduce human interference during surgery, thereby improving surgical efficiency and safety.

Reduce the risk of infection: The use of disposable instruments can effectively reduce the risk of cross-infection, especially in some high-risk surgical environments, which can help reduce overall medical costs.

Shorten hospitalization and recovery time: Minimally invasive surgery itself has the characteristics of less trauma and faster recovery, and the use of disposable instruments further reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, thereby shortening the patient's hospitalization and recovery time, indirectly Reduced hospitalization costs.

Reduced maintenance and sterilization costs: Disposable instruments do not require complex maintenance and sterilization processes, which greatly reduces hospital operating costs.

What are the specific advantages of the approval process for single-use minimally invasive surgical devices?

The specific advantages of the approval process for single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments are mainly reflected in the following aspects:

Reduced risk of infection: Single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments can significantly reduce the risk of infection for patients. Because these instruments are discarded after use, repeated sterilization and potential cross-contamination issues are avoided.

Reduce the burden on hospitals: Compared with reusable instruments, disposable instruments reduce the hospital's disinfection and maintenance workload, thereby reducing the hospital's operating costs and management difficulty.

Improve surgical efficiency: The design of disposable instruments is usually more in line with the needs of modern minimally invasive surgery, and can complete surgical operations quickly and effectively, thus improving surgical efficiency.

Promote innovation and market development: National policies support the research, development and application of single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments, accelerate the launch of innovative products through special approval procedures ("green channels"), and promote technological progress and market expansion in the medical device industry .

How to evaluate the long-term impact of single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments on patient safety?

Assessing the long-term impact of single-use minimally invasive surgical instruments on patient safety requires the consideration of multiple factors. The following is a detailed assessment method:

Clinical trials and data collection:

Conduct multi-center, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trials to evaluate the performance and safety of the device in different settings.
Through long-term follow-up surveys, safety data on patients using these devices are collected to ensure the comprehensiveness and reliability of the data.

Security indicators and detection methods:

Clearly list the functionality, safety indicators and testing methods of single-use devices in product technical requirements, and ensure that these requirements are strictly implemented in actual applications.
Regularly perform preventive maintenance, testing and calibration of medical devices to ensure that the equipment is in good condition and reduce potential safety hazards.

Clinical evaluation:

Use scientific and reasonable methods to evaluate and analyze clinical data to confirm the safety, clinical performance and effectiveness of the device within its scope of application.
Continue to carry out clinical evaluation activities and promptly update and adjust evaluation results to respond to new problems and challenges that may arise.

Technical improvements and optimizations:

Continuously develop and improve the technology of minimally invasive surgical instruments to improve their controllability, operating comfort and safety. For example, developing robot-assisted surgical instruments with good performance to reduce the difficulty of performing surgeries and improve operating comfort.
Promote the use of proven new surgical robots, such as VasCure, which have shown high success rates and low adverse complication rates in clinical trials, further verifying their safety, stability, and effectiveness.

Expert opinion and feedback:

Collect and analyze feedback from doctors and patients about their actual experiences and feelings when using disposable minimally invasive surgical instruments in order to continuously improve and optimize device design.
Through expert seminars and academic conferences, we share research results and lessons learned to promote industry consensus and standard formulation on the safety of minimally invasive surgical devices.

For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Aiden